The Chip Board
Custom Search
   


The Chip Board Archive 05

Re: I would
In Response To: Re: I would ()

What I am opposed to is slabbing. What I stated was that adopting a numerical system is a precursor to that.
I very much doubt that you would ever see a slabbed chip with a designation of very little wear.

I think that this numerical system would have severe difficulties when it came to the different types of chips and manufacturing processes. If you had a metal inlay rated at, lets say a 65 how would that translate to a chipco or a paulson? On the same token [no pun intended] If I used a physical description in 10 words or less it wouldn't you agree it would tell you a lot more?

By you assigning a number, it is merely YOUR opinion. Your description would describe physical flaws.

You state you merely want to associate a number to a phrase. WHY?
Hasn't the physical description worked for you?

Messages In This Thread

Rating Chip Question
I would
Re: I would
Re: I would
Re: I would
Re: Rating Chip Question
Re: Rating Chip Question
Re: Rating Chip Question
Re: Rating Chip Question
Re: Rating Chip Question
Re: Rating Chip Question
Re: Rating Chip Question
Re: Rating Chip Question
Re: Rating Chip Question
Re: Rating Chip Question
Re: Rating Chip Question
Re: Rating Chip Question
Ron, the biggest complaint I have is...
Re: Ron, the biggest complaint I have is...
Re: Ron, the biggest complaint I have is...
Re: Stalking Horse???
Re: Stalking Horse???
Reading the thread.....
One more question....
Re: One more question....

Copyright 2022 David Spragg