The Chip Board
Custom Search
   


The Chip Board Archive 03

Now you're starting to get it, John ...

...

>> There is one part of the act that isn't too clear to me, Jim, and that's
>> where in Sec. 304.1 (f) partially reads: "Such term includes......" and lists
>> coins and tokens. Does "Such term includes" kind of leave it open as to what
>> may actually be included without actually listing what may be excluded?

The answer to your question is NO, the phrase "such term includes" does NOT leave it open as to what may actually be included without a specific listing. This was the original point I made -- and repeated again in my earlier post tonight in response to your "lobbying" message.

>> Either way, I do see a problem with the way that is written.

I think that was my point. ----- jim o\-S

Messages In This Thread

Would this be wrong??? Don't Even Answer!
Re: Would this be wrong??? Don't Even Answer!
Re: I'll answer, anyway.
What do the Candidates say about Hobby Protection?
Re: What do the Candidates say about Hobby Protect
BIG "IMPORTANT" CORRECTION ? (Good Stuff
John, I'd be interested in ...
Re: John, I'd be interested in ...
Re: John, I'd be interested in ...
Re: John, I'd be interested in ...
"In exchange" means ...
Re: "In exchange" means ...
No "sides" here, JB ...
Re: No "sides" here, JB ...
Re: No "sides" here, JB ...
Re: No "sides" here, JB ...
Re: "In exchange" means ...
Re: "In exchange" means ...
I'd still rather hear from a legal ...
Glad that we heard from a Numismatist Expert.
This is a laudable purpose ...
Re: Sounds.....
Here's why the HPA does not apply ...
Re: Here's why the HPA does not apply ...
The government of Nevada cannot ...
Re: John, I'd be interested in ...
What the ANA considers "numismatic" ...
Re: Thank you for your interest, Gentlemen...
The successful use by David Ganz ...
Re: The successful use by David Ganz ...
"HOBBY PROTECTION ACT"
Re: The successful use by David Ganz ...
Thanks for sharing this information ...
Re: Thanks for sharing this information ...
Re: Thanks for sharing this information ...
Re: Thanks for sharing this information ...
There is a problem with your theory ...
Re: The successful use by David Ganz ...
Re: The successful use by David Ganz ...
Re: The successful use by David Ganz ...
The surest way for a lawyer to get ...
Re: The surest way for a lawyer to get ...
Re: The surest way for a lawyer to Jimmied
Re: The surest way for a lawyer to Jimmied
Re: The surest way for a lawyer to Jimmied
Re: The surest way for a lawyer to Jimmied
Re: The surest way for a lawyer to Jimmied
I don't doubt that there are ...
Re: I don't doubt that there are ...
A fake chip on a "wrong" color blank ...
It would be a whole different thing ...
Even better ...
Re: Even better ...
Re: Even better ...Peter
Superfluous statutory language ...
Re: Superfluous Me
And just exactly what depradations ...
Re: There wouldn't be depredations....
Ah, but think how easy harvesting ...
Re: Superfluous statutory language ...
Our Conflicts of Laws class was ...
Re: Superfluous statutory language ...
Are you sure Carl and Mel are not ...
Re: Jim + Gene, Please read the lead post...
If the chip was not "issued" by ...
The partial list of things I don't know ...
"inquire into the issue of lobbying"????
I feel like Brer Rabbit, with the HPA ...
Re: Thanks, Jim. You've made that very clear.
A very "lawyerly" choice of words ...
This is exactly what David Ganz said:
Now you're starting to get it, John ...
Re: Thanks for walking me through it.
The HPA also covers political pins ...
Actually more than just pins ...
Re: Actually would "include" a lot more
The language in the statute ...
Re: John, I'd be interested in ...
"Stretching the limits" ...
Re: "Stretching the limits" ...
Yes Mr. Borland... WRONG, WRONG, WRONG...

Copyright 2022 David Spragg