The Chip Board
Custom Search
   


The Chip Board Archive 05

Re: Chip picture Question
In Response To: Chip picture Question ()

I have been fighting with this for a while. My results are reasonably good to date. What I have found is that a 100dpi scan (using a flatbed scanner) likes OK for the web, but doesn't give enough definition when it is blown up. It keeps the file size small (jpg about 6-8K each chip)- and keeps the chip at the actual chip size (without having to change the attributes for the web). An example is
My biggest problem with this is getting the color right. A chip like is flourescent orange (pink too) looks washed out.

For checkmate, I found that scanning it to 150dpi works well. It makes a larger scan (the chip is bigger than real life) but you can blow up the chip and keep the definition - and even see some things like satin or linen finishes on the chip, or nicks on the H&C edges.

Cameras work well for other items, such as mugs (I will put up some over the weekend), and children or dogs (they just won't stay still on the scanner). Also, the higher resolution seems to work well with the flourescent colors.

Messages In This Thread

Chip picture Question
Re: Chip picture Question
Re: Chip picture Question
Would recommend HP5300Cse scanner
Re: Would recommend HP5300Cse scanner
Re: Would recommend HP5300Cse scanner
is that a fast one-pass type scanner?
Re: is that a fast one-pass type scanner?
Re: is that a fast one-pass type scanner?
Re: is that a fast one-pass type scanner?
Re: Chip picture Question
Re: Chip picture Question
Paul! Here is my scan of the Lady Luck........
Andy you got the magic touch!
Re: Paul! Here is my scan of the Lady Luck........
Re: Chip picture Question
Re: Chip picture Question
Just Make Sure You Use Photshop
Re: Just Make Sure You Use Photshop
Re: Just Make Sure You Use Photshop
Adobe Photoshop Tricks
Re: Adobe Photoshop Tricks
Re: Adobe Photoshop Tricks

Copyright 2022 David Spragg