Yeah....good point with the alarm company and insurance company. That most certainly would lead me to question the validity of the rock through the window claim. Not that it should matter in the decision if he should or should not be removed from the boycott slabber list. But I do believe you are wrong on one thing. As a member of the Slabfree BoD, you do at least owe him your ability to be fair. Whether he lied to you or not, and whether he tried to ruin your hobby, or even if he tried to rape your dog, those all should not influence your decision making when it comes to whether or not he think he is slabbing. It comes down to if he meets the criterion that the Slab Free BoDs have laid down to have someone on the list. After all, the list was not intended to be a once on always on list, right?

All of my rambling all come around to one main point. I am asking that the SlabFree BoDs (the 5 that are voting) go through the list and remove those that are not involved in slabbing or selling slabbed chips. I guess I am also asking that they take it upon themselves to tweak the system. There are others on the list besides Mark Scott, and I would like to think we only have those on the list that are actively slabbing or selling slabbed chips.

I really didn't plan on becoming a torch bearer for those on the list, although from all of my posts, it's sure beginning to sound that way.

I know you don't want to get into anymore on the topic, and frankly, I'm getting a bit burned out on it too. So no need for you and I to get into a debate. Besides, you forget.... I'm a master debater.