The only thing we should be considering is if a person or company is slabbing or not. If they are, they need to be on the list. If they are not, they should be removed. This should be the case for everyone on the list. The list is stating "These are people and companies that are participating in either slabbing or selling slabbed chips". If this statement no long applies to any or all of the list, then they should be removed. If we have successfully changed their slabbing ways, we shouldn't be vindictive. They should be removed.

That is a good point, I agree.

Others have stated they would first want to see Mark Scott remove the ban list before considering him for removal. To me, that's obsurd. One has nothing to do with the other.

In this instance they ARE connected. Mark says it is when he cancels an eBay bid. So, if it's First, or Last, he should state his WILLINGNESS to do so. You stated: we shouldn't be vindictive- does that not apply to him as well?
None of the other people on the list have taken any retalitory action back at the SlabFree members.