Greg; One of the concerns that Slab Free had with respect to the slabbing companies, was their refusal to identify who their graders/authenticators are.

I'm not sure that's a fair comparison: but what is the downside in chipboard users knowing who the site administrators are for the chipboard? Which ONE of your several named administrators deleted a specific post still would not be known. The administrators are held accountable to only you. You have set the guidelines as to what posts are subject to deletion and those guidlines are well-known by most users.

As long as those guidelines are followed, I don't understand why WHO deleted a particular post is an issue. If someone having the authority to delete chipboard posts is exceeding those guidelines, then steps must be taken to correct those actions.

Having said that ... if someone had a post deleted and brings it to your attention for review, why couldn't that individual re-post his/her message if you find nothing wrong with it and you take up the issue with your appointed administrator?

You've been more than fair with your rules for posting. 99% of those persons using thechipboard have played by those rules. It's too bad that a few users (and trolls) have abused their posting privileges.

Just my two chips worth for your consideration.