The Chip Board
Custom Search
   


The Chip Board Archive 13

Your research is flawed.

"All of my research at the UNLV library shows that back in the 60's when the Federal Government choose not make any more one dollar coins, it left the casinos out in the cold."

Facts are that the Federal Government made Eisenhower Dollars in the early to late 70's and the smaller size Susan B. Anthony Dollars in the early 1980's that were used in slot machines in Atlantic City at Resorts International in the case of the Ike Dollar; and at Boardwalk Regency in the case of the SBA Dollar.

Both properties then had their own private tokens made of the same size as the two new government dollar coins so that either dollar tokens or dollar coins could be played in their respective machines that were tooled for that specific size dollar before the standardization of all slot token size later on throughout the city.

Messages In This Thread

A Scenario for Fraud
Re: A Scenario for Fraud
Re: A Scenario for Fraud
"Which parties are guilty of committing fraud?"
Re: "Which parties are guilty of committing fraud?
Re: "Which parties are guilty of committing fraud?
Re: "Which parties are guilty of committing fraud?
Re: serving on any jury
Re: "Which parties are guilty of committing fraud?
I agree only E for fraud
Re: "Which parties are guilty of committing fraud?
Re: A Scenario for Fraud
Re: A Scenario for Fraud
Re: A Scenario for Fraud
Re: A Scenario for Fraud
Re: A Scenario for Fraud
Re: A Scenario for Fraud
Re: A Scenario for Fraud
Re: A Scenario for Fraud
Re: A Scenario for Fraud
Re: A Scenario for Fraud
Re: A Scenario for Fraud
Re: A Scenario for Fraud
Ooops
Re: Ooops
So, your telling me that the Princess Di T Shirt
Re: So, your telling me that the Princess Di T Shi
Re: Another hypothetical Scenario
Re: Another hypothetical Scenario
Re: Another hypothetical Scenario
Re: Another hypothetical Scenario
Or is it because they are
Re: Another hypothetical Scenario
Re: Another hypothetical Scenario
Re: Another hypothetical Scenario
Re: Another hypothetical Scenario
Re: Another hypothetical Scenario
Re: You guys are not getting ....
Re: Another hypothetical Scenario
Re: Another hypothetical Scenario
Re: Another hypothetical Scenario
Re: Another hypothetical Scenario
Re: Another hypothetical Scenario
Re: Another hypothetical Scenario
Re: Another hypothetical Scenario
Re: Another hypothetical Scenario
Re: Another hypothetical Scenario
Re: Another hypothetical Scenario
Re: Another hypothetical Scenario
Re: Another hypothetical Scenario
Re: Another hypothetical Scenario
Fraud
Does anyone have a cite for the HPA?
Here's a link...
Thank you Mark
Addtional info links ...
Re: Fraud
I'm pretty certain the HPA does not ...
Re: It's not clear one way or the other
It's quite clear the terms "coinage" and "issue"
Re: It's quite clear the terms "coinage" and "issu
Re: It's quite clear the terms "coinage" and "issu
Re: It's quite clear the terms "coinage" and "issu
I would say no to #1 and unsure to #2
Re: I would say no to #1 and unsure to #2
Archie, can you show us where the FTC ...
Re: Nope ... sorry I can't ...
I couldn't find it on the club board, either.
Re: I couldn't find it on the club board, either.
Re: I couldn't find it on the club board, either.
Didn't it mention "Hobby Protection Act" John?
Re: Didn't it mention "Hobby Protection Act" John?
Re: Didn't it mention "Hobby Protection Act" John?
Please read this and rethink your previous post
Re: Please read this and rethink your previous pos
See §2101... it says it all
Re: See §2101... it says it all
No question about it
Re: No question about it
rofl So you mean that ... rofl
Re: No question about it
Re: No question about it
Re: No question about it
Casino Chips as Trade Tokens
Re: Casino Chips as Trade Tokens
Re: Casino Chips as Trade Tokens
Re: Casino Chips as Trade Tokens
Nope. "Trade Tokens" are not part of a coinage.
Webster's defines "commerce" well.
Re: Webster's defines "commerce" well.
I will check it tomorrow...
"Commerce" as defined in Black's Law Dictionary
Re: "Commerce" as defined in Black's Law Dictionar
For those interested...
Strange
Re: For those interested...
I believe you will find that is up to
Re: I believe you will find that is up to
Spot on. I can say no more grin
The HPA is a federal law
Correct. Its like a lucky dip grin
Re: Fraud
We won't know until it hits the courts
Re: Fraud
Re: Fraud
Re: Fraud
Re: Fraud
Re: Fraud
Re: Fraud
Re: Fraud
I have no idea what you are arguing
Re: I have no idea what you are arguing
There we go! That's what I was looking for.
Re: There we go! That's what I was looking for.
Me too!
Re: I have no idea what you are arguing
Re: Hey David MI 5 Wants..
Re: Hey David MI 5 Wants..
Re: I have no idea what you are arguing
Re: I have no idea what you are arguing
Your research is flawed.
Re: Your research is flawed.
Re: TOKENS ...
A/C was not lone ranger on Susan B dollars...
I don't collect Lone Ranger tokens ... grin
Re: A Scenario for Fraud
Re: A Scenario for Fraud
Re: A Scenario for Fraud
Re: A Scenario for Fraud
You guys lost me about 2 threads into this....
Re: You guys lost me about 2 threads into this....
OK - Lets try again - revised scenario
Aaron?
David??
Uncle Tom Cobley??
Michael??
Archie??
Re: Archie??
Yup, its there
Re: A Scenario for Fraud
Re: A Scenario for Fraud
Re: A Scenario for Fraud
Re: A Scenario for Fraud
Re: Chips/Coins
Re: Chips/Coins
Re: HPA covers chips
Re: HPA covers chips
Re: A Scenario for Fraud
Re: A Scenario for Fraud
Wow!
Re: Wow!
Re: This forum is not a "Chat Room"
Re: A Scenario for Fraud
Re: A Scenario for Fraud
Re: A Scenario for Fraud
Black's Law Dictionary definition of "Fraud"
Re: Black's Law Dictionary definition of "Fraud"
Re: Black's Law Dictionary definition of "Fraud"

Copyright 2022 David Spragg