The Chip Board
Custom Search
   


The Chip Board Recent Archive

That is not what I am looking for, Archie ~~~

~~~ nor do I have a voice to answer such a question and, I have not mentioned anyone's name other than Eisenstadt though, in the past two days (and past years and mentioned by Rich Burgel) I have read that there appears to be a pattern that some Hall of Fame members choose not to vote which, seems very odd since the only reason why they are Hall of Fame members is because someone else voted for them and, I was under the impression that each person who is formally recommended, the HOF members determine the outcome by majority vote and, now what you just asked is this is not the case and all those who have been recommended are in competition with each other which, still is confusing how more than one person has been inducted into the Hall of Fame in one year and, I am told that is due to a tie vote.

Is the HOF election a process where each person who is formally recommended voted for individually for a majority vote and then move on to the next person who was formally recommended to be voted on or, are all those who are formerly recommended part of one competitive vote such as in a general election where there can be two or more candidates running for an election?

Also, you mentioned yesterday that it took "several" years for David to be inducted and, in the same breath recommended that I keep submitting Eisenstadt's name who is deceased and cannot add to his accomplishments as David has done each year after he was not successfully inducted.

Again, I am not sure how this vote takes place other than reading what I have read here that each formally recommended candidate is up for a individual majority vote and you just telling me that it's not the case where one candidate is in competition with one or more other candidates.

Messages In This Thread

Could these be the reasons EISENSTADT ~~~
Re: Could the reason be that Spragg ....
That is not what I am looking for, Archie ~~~
John; May I respectfully tequest
Yes. Of course, Archie.
Forgot to mention .....
Finally, that is the "change" I was searching for
John; “The lack of interest” in voting....
The lack of interest was way before this HOF vote
"the man didn't deserve this outcome"
The real shame is the people who REALLY dont
Well said Doug. Thanks !!!
You're 100% correct as was Archie.

Copyright 2022 David Spragg