Though I can understand that problem; thus my opening remark that I was sure the majority of thoss 30+ year HOF members knew Robert's accomplishments and what he added to the club and hobby but, should a recommendation without enough supporting information be reason for not any of the majority who knew Robert's accomplishments not having added whatever they thought was necessary during the "discussion period" that Charles had mentioned? If not, I don't see the benefit of any discussion if there.is a lack of teamwork without any effort being made to accomplish what was being presented.

I cannot understand how a majority of HOF members who know Robert's accomplishments not discussing them because of a lack of supporting information in the recommendation.