The Chip Board
Custom Search
   


The Chip Board Archive 17

Re: NCR Didn't mean to open a can of worms but NCR

It would need to be designed to withstand the "head pressure" of the water at the deepest it could ever be expected to reach. Unless the river was absurdly small, the change in depth caused by a ship displacing some of the water would by too small to measure. It would be more important to take into account seasonal variations and historical high water points, and even ship's wakes. A safety factor would be applied to cover all the minor unknowns.

But just for fun, keep in mind the ship has its effect whether its under the bridge or a mile upstream. So really the ship was probably already in the water when the depth was measuredm, and so was part of the calculation even though it wasn't considered. Ships come and ships go, but they're always there, and their average dispacement affects the depth...but not much!

Messages In This Thread

NCR For The Engineers On The Board NCR
Weight of ships has to be in the calculation
Ahh - I see, thank you David.
True, but since water is fluid............
That is probably too complex an answer for Bill
From a hamburger engineers point of view
Re: From a hamburger engineers point of view
Re: From a hamburger engineers point of view
Possible, but remember, the weight of whatever
Does it make any difference...
Perhaps the system only needed to...
Re: NCR For The Engineers On The Board NCR
NCR Didn't mean to open a can of worms but NCR
Re: NCR Didn't mean to open a can of worms but NCR
Bill,
Re: NCR Didn't mean to open a can of worms but NCR
Re: NCR Didn't mean to open a can of worms but NCR
Greg,
Greg is correct, but no it would not overflow
That makes sense.....

Copyright 2022 David Spragg