The Chip Board
Custom Search
   


The Chip Board Archive 17

Re: Not responsible if not insured = license to st

Actually, the law is to place the risk of loss on the seller unless the parties agree otherwise. The agreement for buyer to pay insurance or risk the loss themselves is somewhat akin to an F.O.B. place of shipment contract. Risk of loss shifts when the package is placed with the carrier, in this case the post office.

Still, I agree with you. It doesn't seem right to shift the burden to the buyer who has no control over the condition of the chip before it arrives.

Michael Siskin

Messages In This Thread

Not responsible if not insured = license to steal
If you bought that item from me....
My Pet Peeve is......
What does that mean to....
Re: What does that mean to....
Well Said Rick
Not necessarily true.
Re: Not necessarily true.
Re: Not necessarily true.
I disagree.
Re: My Pet Peeve is......
Re: My Pet Peeve is......
Then there are the abuses...
Mark
Perhaps We Are On To Something...
MARK
Re: Then there are the abuses...
Well....
Re: Well....
Re: Well....
Re: Well....
Re: My Pet Peeve is......
Re: My Pet Peeve is......
what if PayPal insurance coverage
Re: Not responsible if not insured = license to st
Re: Not responsible if not insured = license to st
Re: Not responsible if not insured = license to st
Certainly

Copyright 2022 David Spragg