The Chip Board
Custom Search
   


The Chip Board Archive 16

Id like to see proof of these emails also

They were clearly not brought to the attention of those involved in dealing with the complaint you filed against Josh in this matter. Ive just re-checked the files.
You made the purchase on 29 November 2005.
On 1 December, before you could have possibly received any chips from Josh, you made this post:
http://www.thechipboard.com/cgi-bin/tcbarc14/tcbarc14.pl?read=474784

Your next post was this one, some 10 days later.
http://www.thechipboard.com/cgi-bin/tcbarc14/tcbarc14.pl?read=477536

However, it was a full 2 days after that when your first post appears from your AZ IP address, the address to which Josh shipped your purchase.
http://www.thechipboard.com/cgi-bin/tcbarc14/tcbarc14.pl?read=477808

That day, 13th December, is the earliest you could have received them.

"I sent you multiple emails and it was YOU who refused to respond to my questions. Only after several such failures on your part, did I send the Certified Letter as a means to GET YOUR ATTENTION!"

Why did your letter not mention you had tried to contact him before? Why did you only wait 6 days if that was the case? Josh could easily have been on vacation for longer than 6 days - you had just had a 10 day absence yourself. Why did you choose to time the letter so it would arrive on Christmas Eve?
Go back and read all your related posts on this board at the time. Refresh your own memory. You knew what you were going to do before you even hit that BIN button - you virtually broadcast it to us all.

Dont forget either the list of 'demands' which you tried to 'blackmail' Josh with in order for you to drop the complaint. No way IMO anyone acting in that way should be standing for election.

Finally,
"although I have no regret for filing a Claim against you"
Had you subsequently regretted the way you handled this whole affair you might have been getting a whole lot more votes. grin

Messages In This Thread

sad I understand this house mold has...
If thats true then it must be a counterfeit mold
Re: If thats true then it must be a counterfeit mo
Re: 100% clay composite
Yes, Ive seen whats been posted on chiptalk
Blight?
I'll take this one....
Re: I'll take this one....
Re: I'll take this one....
Re: Dunes logo copyrights
Re: Dunes logo copyrights
Re: Dunes logo copyrights
Re: Dunes logo copyrights
Re: Dunes logo copyrights
Re: Dunes logo copyrights
Re: Dunes logo copyrights
Re: I'll Huh?
Re: Blight?
Gene, does this mean that there is no...
Re: Gene, does this mean that there is no...
Re: Is that the case?
Jerry, you are very mistaken here and jumping to..
Re: Jerry, you are very mistaken here and jumping
Josh, why did you list.....
Re: Josh, why did you list.....
Re: Josh, why did you list.....
So.....
Actually Bob, there were a couple of
No Conclusions.....
Re: No Conclusions.....
EDUCATION!
And...
Re: sad I understand this house mold has...
I am happy to see..
Michael. The repros are plastic.
You are incorrect
Yes, technically, I was incorrect
Re: sad I understand this house mold has...
I will give him a modicum of benefit of doubt
David, that is correct! Gene is jumping to...
Re: Jim Maybe You..
Gene, I do not like the re-establishment of the...
Re: Evidently you do.
Gene, it is a discussion. I do not see...
Re: Gene, it is a discussion. I do not see...
Re: Gene, it is a discussion. I do not see...
Josh, in the interest of civility...
Re: Josh, in the interest of civility...
Sorry Josh, just is not going to happen...
Id like to see proof of these emails also
Sorry David, just is not going to happen for you..
Re: Sorry David, just is not going to happen for y
Josh, as long as we didn't exchange emails at...
Re: Josh, as long as we didn't exchange emails at.
Re: Josh, in the interest of civility...
On this one, I concede that if you have in fact

Copyright 2022 David Spragg