Let's backtrack:
Josh offers a home poker set for sale on ebay. In his ad, he inserts images of classic Vegas chips for comparative purposes (of the mold).
Another club member takes umbrage, and publicly denounces Josh on the CB, stating that he is going to bid on the auction and expects to receive the classic Vegas chips as well. It is quite obvious that the expensive chips are not part of the ebay set being offered for sale; yet the club member, despite being warned not to, buys the set on ebay and when the rare chips are not included with the purchase, he lodges a formal complaint against Josh. He does so knowing full well that the rare chips were not part of the auction.
The complaint is settled (for various reasons).
The new ad has no description other than “Las Vegas chip.” Rather than face another Catch-22 situation, he decided to make the description simple. It is now the responsibility of the buyer to do his or her research. Caveat Emptor.
Josh is not doing anything wrong...AGAIN.
And if emails are going unanswered, why not try calling the telephone number he clearly provides in the ebay ad?
MP