"Bob you aren't making sense. I am not in the same place, running and hiding, or following anyone anywhere. You are reading what you want to read."

No, I'm reading your words.

"Again - you, like Peter, want to avoid the issue of listing a garbeg, 60 cent chip as a 'casino chip.'"

I don't care if Pete describes that chip as a casino chip, as long as he doesn't misrepresent it as have actually coming from a real casino. As far as I'm concerned, it is a matter of semantics.

"Bob, I don't really care what you think about me. When I see something I don't like or want to voice an opinion, I'll do it without regard for how you feel about it."

That doesn't matter to me. What does matter to me is how you have publicly verbally spit on many people. People who, in my mind, didn't deserve the treatment you gave them. ...the list is long, and it grows everyday you are involved in this forum.

"And there you go again, calling me a jerk. Why? because you don't agree with my position? Too bad - I don't care and to state it plainly, you have no issue in this post. You just can't resist jumping in to hear yourself talk."

See the above post.

"Oh, so you have had issues with Peter as well huh? Join the silent chippers who fear his wrath Hey - this IS about Peter, his practices and his response to any who dare question him. His fragile ego can't seem to take any questioning at all."

I've stated that I don't have a problem with Pete's description of the chip in question. Pete has been pretty mellow here for the last couple years. I don't fear his wrath in any way. I will confront anyone when I feel their online actions are over the edge. FWIW, I've met Pete in person. Get back to me when you can say the same...

"There you go again, talking in circles. You want to confront someone I have a problem with, but you didn't do the same."

See the above post.

"Contacted BCPD about a faulty laptop? That's pretty funny Bob. I'm sure they showed a lot of interest in a laptop in Colorado that wasn't working properly. I guess they had to struggle to keep a straight face while they took your report. I bet they still have a hard laugh over that down at BCPD to this day."

They were actually quite helpful, and nobody was laughing.

"You issued a retraction because you came to your senses and realized I had nothing at all to do with whatever happened to your laptop."

See my previous posts.

"You say that 'the problem was definitely cause by the introduction of a corrupting influence from a source outside of my machine.' Hey, given that description, it could be YOU."

Nope.

"If you know it was an 'intrusion' why is it you can't seem to pinpoint what or who intruded the machine, its origin and what it did to corrupt the thing?"

I know what it did. I know how it did it. I didn't have the intrusion detection software in place that I do now, so I don't know who did it. Now I'm playing your game. I won't tell you everything that I know, just like you won't tell some people who post to this forum how you know they don't have or aren't using firewalls on their computers.

Bob