The Chip Board
Custom Search
   


The Chip Board Archive 05

Re: 394 - Majority of 2000?
In Response To: Re: 394 - Majority of 2000? ()

Mathmaticly you are correct. I have seen the group of 400 downplayed as a minority, or not representing the whole group. Someone put the pencil to the numbers and came up with 16% (400=16% of the total). What I find funny is that whan a group representing ONLY 10% of the total group of stockholders everyone of the board members treats them with great respect because they realize that they weild great power in swaying a vote. I don't think that our (CC>CC) board has realized that yet. There are 400 people willing to belly up and say, "This is where I stand." Don't make the mistake of thinking the 'others' all believe differently. Some do, some don't. After the split is made from the 'silient majority'(that DO vote) then ADD 400 known votes. Tips the scale pretty fast! Don't be fooled by the 'hard' numbers..... (psst..current board).

Messages In This Thread

394 - Majority of 2000?
Re: 394 - Majority of 2000?
Re: 394 - Majority of 2000?
Re: 394 - Majority of 2000?
Scott, I don't have a degree in either, but it....
Re: Scott, I don't have a degree in either, but it
Re: 394 - Majority of 2000?
717 Voted In CCGTCC Election
Scott, I said "I haven't seen it. "...
Re: 394 - Majority of 2000?
HOW ABOUT A LIST OF SLABBERS?
Re: HOW ABOUT A LIST OF SLABBERS?
The List & being SlabFREE
It is TRUE
Re: The List & being SlabFREE
Re: The List & being SlabFREE

Copyright 2022 David Spragg