I think it's a matter of semantics. This debate on changing the rules for the auction has to be framed more around the benefit to the majority rather than the minority. More national exposure is a benefit to us all. That'a point which should be emphasized. The constant referral to z-rated chips, I believe, leave many of us cold. I know I must represent the silent majority when I say I could care less whether there is one less z-chip in the.

Take for example, tax cuts. If you only point out how the rich benefit, the debate will be lost. How tax cuts are a benefit to the whole economy is the way to win support.