|
|
|
... Larry, by failing to include an appropriate caveat IMMEDIATELY at the beginning of your post! <g> Such as:
"NONE of the chips representating the Year 2000 as the start of the New Millennium ought to be recognized as 'Millennium' chips, since the New Millennium doesn't start until 1-1-2001. That being said, we can categorize all of the incorrectly issued 'Millennium' chips as follows:"
That way you could have made your point regarding characterization of the chips which we DO have to deal with and still maintained your dignity! <g>
BTW, I agree with JB's post about this. I will have more to say on that subject in my February ChipBox column, in which I will announce my 1999 RunTy Awards.
----- jim o\-S
|
|