The Chip Board
Custom Search
   


The Chip Board Archive 01

Re: DEFAMATION, PART V, CONCLUSION

Travis-couldn't agree with you more. While inflammatory language often makes the writer feel better, it adds no value to the merit of the argument, and often raises a defense (and counterattack) response in the target. You can always tell someone he's a crook with a twinkle in your eye and a smile on your face!;-)

Messages In This Thread

DEFAMATION, PART V, CONCLUSION
Re: DEFAMATION, PART V, CONCLUSION
Re: DEFAMATION, PART V, CONCLUSION
Re: DEFAMATION, PART V, CONCLUSION
Re: DEFAMATION, PART V, CONCLUSION
Re: DEFAMATION -- Public Officials
Re: DEFAMATION, PART V, CONCLUSION
Re: DEFAMATION, PART V, CONCLUSION
Re: DEFAMATION, PART V, CONCLUSION
Re: DEFAMATION, PART V, CONCLUSION
Re: DEFAMATION, PART V, CONCLUSION

Copyright 2022 David Spragg