The Chip Board
Custom Search
   


The Chip Board Recent Archive

Re: Happy to do so.

I did not mention Playboy and especially not the £10 that you keep banging on about. Richard mentioned the Playboy plaque on the other thread which was relevant and you jumped in just so you could that you say (yet again) that it was you that found the £10 (in a catalogue) and knew it existed. As we now know it did and they still do which is great and new information has been found over the years since Tom's brilliant book.
Your assertions that any plaques would be kept hush hush from the gaming board is ridiculous as they did regular visits for a start plus if it was hush hush then why would he be showing it off?
My replies were relevant unlike yours but then you like to hijack many posts with irrelevant (or vaguely so) "facts" or word salads just so you can get involved. It's pointless discussing anything with you as in your mind (which often bears no resemblance to reality) you are always right.
You put the post about the Playboy plaque (yet again) and I assumed it was a carry on from the other thread (as it probably was or why bother repeating it). You mentioned the £10 on the other thread which was irrelevant to the Clermont one which was why I mentioned it. I should have guessed you wouldn't have been able to keep up.
As to the coffee table remark, as the Clermont plaque was sold when Mecca owned the Clermont I was just clarifying what I had been told previously, sorry if you didn't manage to grasp that. IF they still have one then it was either they who bought it or it is another.............
I usually delete my posts when you've hijacked them and do it consistently whereas you just post lots of rubbish hoping to get a reply (or an argument) and when nobody bites you delete them and a heck of a lot more than I do so kettle and pot come to mind.
As to your " I think there were exactly 10 made and not 11," what is that actually based on?
And just because you believe what he says is accurate does not make it so as I tried to explain on the other post.
The main reason I don't usually post on here much is due to your waffling on about whatever is vaguely relevant that you can post yet again (probably for the 50th time) and I doubt it's only me that has stopped because of that but then, that's beside the point.
As soon as you talk out the correct orifice then I will listen to what you have to say in regards to Playboy or Clermont items.

Messages In This Thread

From Tom Stroh; £100,000 PLAYBOY LONDON "plaques"
Re: As we now know...........
Re: As we now know...........
Re: Thanks Richard.
Re: As we now know...........
Re: Possibly.
Bottom line of what we know thus far from Tom ~~~
I am now wondering if the £100,000 plaques ~~~
Re: As we now know...........
Re: Thanks David.
The £100,000 Gold mentioned here by David.
Re: The £100,000 Gold plaque
I think this ChipGuide entry is now very accurate
Re: Hmm.
Re: Here's hoping.
That is why I used the term "hush-hush" because ~~
Re: Whatever............
Clearly, it was you who brought up PLAYBOY -~~~
...and your coffee table remark which has nothing
...and your direct response to this archived post
...and your "could be more people who know more"
Re: What more could I want?
Re: Happy to do so.
Re: It doesn't matter who brought up Playboy.
Re: It doesn't matter who brought up Playboy.
Re: It doesn't matter who brought up Playboy.

Copyright 2022 David Spragg