There are a few threads during the time I had recommended ROBERT EISENSTADT for consideration which pretty much described the process to convince me that the process is in order and nothing less though, that was not my reason for being a bit rude in not fully accepting that HOF members may not know who a certain person being recommended is and need a complete, detailed statement to such... which, might not really be needed and certainly not a reason to discarded as an incomplete recommendation especially since Robert Eisenstat was widely known and contributed to several HOF members' books, articles and collections. The excuses I read that "...well, we really can't have too many of those being recommended being voted in during one year" was, in my opinion completely out of order... That is when I gave up and decided if I did anything more and try to convince any HOF member who Robert is and will always be, it would not have been something that Robert really wanted.

Our club did not even consider Robert a Historian for devoting most of his 30 years as a member in researching and sharing what he found in holding nothing back...