The Chip Board
Custom Search
   


The Chip Board Recent Archive

Nope. I know "0" about the plaques except ~~~
In Response To: Re: Yep. ()

~~~ that what Tom was told had to come from someone who knew what they were talking about as I said and will continue to believe... and if it was so easy to learn that the Gold Playboy plaque existed as Tom described, why didn't you learn of it after asking all those ex-employees from Playboy and who all else you told us you asked? It was made a long, long time ago as Tom noted.

I never, ever said anything about knowing of either except for what I thought.

Never spoke to Tom about the Gold or £100k plaques, either... and, whatever I told Tom about anything Playboy related would be in his notes if he kept any...

Tom not only sent me all his books; he sent me everything before publication as well to check over and add on to, as he might have done with others and if you were reading everything I said about who Tom connected with and where, maybe you wouldn't need to go on and on and on about what you claim doesn't matter...

Messages In This Thread

(Message Deleted by Poster)
Re: Clermont £100,000 gold plaque.
Re: Clermont £100,000 gold plaque.
Re: Clermont £100,000 gold plaque.
Re: A gold one?
Re: A gold one?
A gold one? Here's an exact description of it ~~~
Re: 1st Playboy book.
I, too, seem to recall a greater value tha £8,000
Re: Clermont £100,000 gold plaque.
Tom mentions the cost of the first £100,000 ~~~
Re: Negotiable plaque.
Re: Clermont £100,000 gold plaque.
I responded to your post you made in my thread ~~.
..and here are my responses.
Re: I responded to your post you made in my thread
Re: Thanks for spoiling the thread.
Re: Thanks for spoiling the thread.
Re: It's not that hard, surely.
Re: Thanks for spoiling the thread.
Re: Rubbish.
The best possible photos are probably right under
Re: The best possible photos are probably right un
Yep. It all confirmed Tom was 100% correct ~~~
Re: Yep.
Nope. I know "0" about the plaques except ~~~
Re: Yep, that is clear.
Nothing needed to be confirmed with what Tom said
Re: As I suspected, just speculation.
I explained the thing about the diamonds ~~~.
He clearly is responding in a PLAYBOY thread ~~~
Now I have one question for you, Garin.
Re: That's an easy one.
Re: Maybe if I explain the timeline.
Re: Maybe if I explain the timeline.
Re: Maybe if I explain the timeline.
Re: Thanks David.
...and it also appears that Tom got the info ~~~
Re: Assumptions.
I think you're on the right track with the mixup ~
That would be for either or both ChipGuide Webmast
Re: Assumptions.

Copyright 2022 David Spragg