~~~ in respect to the posts delivered.

When actual photos and printed text attached to those photos by a manufacture showing where their production was shipped; and when the distributor who received that production photos those chips and offeres them for sale in their catalogs, should be proof that the chip was generic.

Where; how many; when and by whom that generic chip was in play does not suggest those chips were intended for any such casino/club/household...

...but to discount all facts brought to the attention of anyone asking information or to slap anyone who suggests what the initial reason of manufacture was intended for is dead wrong; especially when those facts come right from the manufacturer.

The Florida Palm (the distributor's name for the chip) chip could have been used at many locations... and there is even a possibility that perhaps one of those locations liked the chips and placed a special order with USPC at which time both USPC and the distributor might have no longer made them available to anyone else, but that does not change all photos and text made available, prior, nor does it give the person asking a question of attribution the right to say what was said because such information did not conform to their belief due to the lack of research on their part -- the actual research they are asking for.