as it's been noted over & over again, it was the policy of the South Point. The did not need to adopt a position on this because the policy in 2009 was different then the policy in 2010 -- and we were unaware of this change. And unless that Nevada Clean Air law came into effect between June 2009 & June 2010 (which it did not), it then became a policy decision of the South Point. You interpret the Nevada law as you see fit, Archie...it's up to interpretation. What exactly changed in that law from 2009 to 2010...nothing. What you don't seem to understand is that the confusion concerning this policy -- which should be consistent for ALL South Point events held in that area -- is that it changed from week to week or year to year with no change to an existing law. It doesn't make much sense to me that the South Point would risk being cited or fined if it was in fact law.

This discussion has really become very tired. And to quote Mr. Trimble, put a fork in me -- I'm done.

Steve Bedo