Thanks, Michael. 
 
 
 
 
 
Messages In This Thread
- Courtesy and professionalism...a question 
- hit 'em with the negative.
- Here are his negs...see any similarities? 
- This is a member?....WOW!!! 
- With all those negs ...
- Re: With all those negs ...I was warned 
 
  
 
- WOW! Less than 30 seconds after my post... 
- Something positive from another member 
- Rick, can you post his ebay name?
- email me and I will give it to you 
 
 
- Rick Can I have money too? LOL.... 
- Holy Hot Controversy Batman
    
- Isn't there a 30 time limit on feedback? 
 
- Re: Isn't there a 30 time limit on feedback? 
- Yes. I meant 30 day time limit. 
 
- Re: Yes. I meant 30 day time limit. 
- Re: Yes. I meant 30 day time limit. 
- What a load of crap! 
- Rick Is 100% Correct
- I'll bet you 100 chips that the USPS will tell any 
- Wrong
- Let's hope it doesn't get to "a court of law" 
 
 
 
 
- Rick, I think you are way out of line.
- David with all due respect... 
- "you are not privy to the emails"
- Well David...since you ask... 
- A poor attitude from you also.
- I disagree with you, David
- Opinion noted, and I will add......
 
- Re: A poor attitude from you also. 
- OK, lets be realistic for a minute.
- Re: OK, lets be realistic for a minute. 
 
 
- Aye Carumba.....David,David, 
- Re: Aye Carumba.....David,David,
 
   
 
 
- I was told that I could NOT insure To Canada
- Priority mail to Canada is insured
 
  
 
- Re: What a load of crap! 
- Wow..... 
- Josh.........
  
   
- Re: Yes. I meant 30 day time limit. 
  
 
 
 
 
- Re: Courtesy and professionalism...a question
- Re: Here is my thinking
- Re: Courtesy and professionalism...a question 
- Re: Courtesy and professionalism...a question
- Send it to Vegas! 
 
- Re: Send it to Vegas!
 
 
 
  
- Here is what to do....... 
- But who knows....... 
 
- Question for Rick
- My take on "Insurance"
- Re: Question for Rick
- Raises a question though........
- Re: Raises a question though........
- At the end of the day though,
 
 
 
  
- Re: Courtesy and professionalism...a question 
- Re: Courtesy and professionalism...a question
 
- Am I the only person who noticed this...?
- Good Point
- HOLD ON GUYS..... 
 
- Re: Am I the only person who noticed this...?
- Re: Am I the only person who noticed this...?
 
  
- Code of Ethics?
- Re: Code of Ethics?
- I agree ...... 
- I don't want to go that route 
- Re: I agree ......
  
 
 
- We Have Been Over This Before and 
- Just a suggestion
- Everyone has an opinion, so do I
- I would never ship anything of value w/o insurance 
 
- So, Rick... Care to tell the class what you've .. 
- I learned this: 
 
- Rick you sure have a lot of bad luck! 
- Since you asked for opinions, here's mine...
- Why is it so hard to understand the risk of loss? 
- Maybe you can sleep at night with that...
- I N S U R A N C E 
- Show me a link to the auction... 
- I haven't read the auction description ... 
- Under insurance, it says, "none" 
 
 
- INSURANCE WAS NOT OFFERED! 
- THEN WHY DID SPRAGG SAY IT WAS; AND YOU REFUSED IT 
- No idea and because this has gone on for far too l 
- Lets end this discussion..this is getting silly 
 
 
- Don't be a liar Rick 
- Re: Don't be a liar Rick 
- Yawn............. 
 
 
  
- Re: I N S U R A N C E
   
- Re: Maybe you can sleep at night with that... 
- Oops. I didn't mean for my post...
- You are a fine, upstanding guy, Brian 
 
- Re: Wherer is the basic rule of law.. 
- It's part of the Uniform Commercial Code 
- Re: It's part of the Uniform Commercial Code 
- Re: It's part of the Uniform Commercial Code 
- Re: It's part of the Uniform Commercial Code 
- Yes... 
- Re: Yes... 
- Re: Yes... 
- Re: litigated to death long ago 
 
 
 
- Find a case that shows that I'm wrong 
 
  
 
 
- Here's the "UCC" From Cornell Univ Law School site 
- See Part 3: § 2-301 General Obligations of Parties 
- It's UCC section 2-509 
- ok here's my rebuttal argument 
 ...
- Nice try 
 
- Re: Nice try 
 
- In this case, Gene, you are wrong 
- Re:Sorry I pitched the fork 
 
 
- Wait, Aaron Should Be Around Soon 
 
 
- Not that soon I wouldn't think
- Who needs Aaron, anyway? We have Gene to interpret 
 
 
 
- Re: you are wrong Maybe Not!!! 
- ok, now you have me 
 
  
 
- Thanks, Michael. 
 
  
 
   
  
 
  
- One final point 
- PLease 
- Rich, you have holes in your example...
- Re: Rich, you have holes in your example... 
- I guess we can agree to disagree...
- Re: I guess we can agree to disagree... 
- arrrg!!!
- I'm done. 
 
 
 
 
- Also I wanted to say thanks for the debate...
  
 
- Here's a better example:
  
- I don't buy this argument..
- Re: I don't buy this argument..
- Re: I don't buy this argument.. 
- Re: I don't buy this argument.. 
- Re: I don't buy this argument.. 
- Mailing receipt .. 
- Excellent point, Michael (about no insurance). 
  
- You are 100% correct , Barry 
- I don't agree ....................... 
- Yes, as I noted elsewhere ... 
 
- Good grief John....
- "Good grief.."? Josh shows us he offered insurance 
- OK HERE'S MY 2 CENTS ON THIS SUBJECT!!!!!!!! 
  
  
  
 
 
 
     
 
- Hmmmm...guess this isn't going away 
- Geez... I looked at your auction and don't see....
 
  
- Re: Courtesy and professionalism...a question
                
 
 
 
Copyright 2022 David Spragg