Messages In This Thread
- Question on terminology?? 
- Re: Question on terminology??
- Re: Question on terminology?? 
- Re: Question on terminology??
- Re: Question on terminology?? 
- Re: Question on terminology??
- I will throw this into the mix
- Re: Question on terminology?? 
- Re: They were obs. at one time
- Re: They were obs. at one time 
- Re: They were retired
-  
 What is double custody? 
- Re: 
 What is double custody?
- It's what i had after my divorce. 
 
 
- Re: 
 What is double custody?
-  
 Thanks for explaining... 
 
   
 
 
- Re: Isn't that the issue in the discussion... 
- Obsolete ... "not available"
- Re: Isn't that the issue in the discussion... 
- Re: Isn't that the issue in the discussion... 
 
- Re: just not the commonly accepted one
- Re: just not the commonly accepted one 
 
   
  
- I need these chips ! 
 
  
  
 
 
 
 
- Re: Question on terminology?? 
- Obsolete vs retired ...
- 30 lbs in whose favor? 
- Re: 30 lbs in whose favor? 
 
- Only when the redemption has expired 
 
 
- Purposely left out. 
  
 
- Re: Question on terminology??
- I Ifully agree with this definition 
- Jim, I think there is a further distinction
- Re: Jim, I think there is a further distinction
- Re: Jim, I think there is a further distinction 
- Re: Jim, I think there is a further distinction
- Re: Jim, I think there is a further distinction 
 
- Re: Jim, I think there is a further distinction 
  
- No 'point', you just agreed with me
- Re: No 'point', you just agreed with me 
- Re: No 'point', you just agreed with me
- Re: No 'point', you just agreed with me
- Re: No 'point', you just agreed with me 
- Say what you will ...
 
 
- Which part of NV is AC in? 
- Whoops - that was for John. 
- That's the issue David ...
- Re: That's the issue David ...
- I doubt if you have a rack of Playboy $500's David
- I doubt if I have a rack of either 
 
 
- It's not complicated at all David ..
  
 
  
  
 
 
- Re: Jim, I think there is a further distinction 
   
- I must disagree .....
- That means nothing
- Re: That means nothing
- i would say they are retired.
 
 
- Re: I must disagree .....
- Re: I must disagree .....
- Re: I must disagree .....
- Re: I must disagree .....
- Re: I must disagree .....
 
- New classification - "Gone"
- Re: so the 24k chip in my safe is a fraud? 
- "Finito" sounds a little more classy 
 
- Re: lost to history
  
   
 
 
  
  
- Additional considerations on the issue 
- Re: Additional considerations on the issue
- Re: Additional considerations on the issue 
- Re: Additional considerations on the issue
- Re: Additional considerations on the issue 
- Re: Additional considerations on the issue
- Arch-Miester.... 
- Re: are not the same in A.C
- Gene; I thought that we were ...
- Re: Gene; I"OBSOLETE".
- Re: Gene; OBSOLETE".
- Re: Gene; OBSOLETE".
 
 
 
 
  
- Re: Additional considerations on the issue
- Re: Additional considerations on the issue 
 
  
 
 
- You are not all paying attention 
  
- Re: Additional considerations on the issue
- Re: Additional considerations on the issue 
 
- Re: Additional considerations on the issue 
- Re: Additional considerations on the issue 
- Terry, Yes,Yes,Yes 
 
 
 
 
   
- This is how I do it... 
    
- MY ANSWER: RETIRED OR OBSOLETE 
- RETIRED OR OBSOLETE 
- Re: RETIRED OR OBSOLETE 
 
- IM OBSOLETE 
 
- Re: IM OBSOLETE 
 
 
- IMO, Obsolete 
 
  
 
- True.... 
  
     
 
 
 
Copyright 2022 David Spragg