The Chip Board
Custom Search
   


The Chip Board Archive 12

Re: John, Please read the auction again

to throw in my two cents, I agree with everyone:
(1) as mentioned above, compared to most other auctions for these Borland fake/commemorative poker chips, the seller should get a better business bureau-type award. They are obsolete.
(2) on the other hand, the seller should have made clear that they are poker chips AND that they are not casino chips (were never used in a casino) since the way it is worded now, many people will be fooled.

Frankly, I lean towards point #2. I'd bet anything that the seller knows what he is selling and is hoping many buyers will be fooled. It is so easy to add the few clarifying words. The chip is mostly a souvenier chip, not a "gaming" chip.

Robert

Messages In This Thread

Sad to see this type of auction!!!!
Whats wrong with that auction?
Re: Whats wrong with that auction?
John, Please read the auction again
Re: John, Please read the auction again
Re: Doug, I find it deceptive, but...
Re: Doug, I find it deceptive, but...
Re: When I was a newbie...
OK, Ok if we want to play the semantics game you
Re: John, Please read the auction again
Re: John, Please read the auction again
Re: And he would probably...
Re: Whats wrong with that auction?
Not only that, but I dont think they were ever $1
Re: Not only that, but I dont think they were ever
I feel this seller knows exactly
I agree with you John
Re: I wonder why someone would bid on it?

Copyright 2022 David Spragg