At least judging by the volume of responses and inquiries that I've received thus far.

I could reiterate the reasoning proffered in the earlier post (however sound or unsound that it might be) or offer additional 'justifications' based on risk/reward, but such I fear would just set off a p*ssing match as to what constitutes a 'fair' price for the chip. Such arguments would not convince anyone, and serve little useful purpose. However, the board is not mine to dictate what discussions take place: flame away if you must!

Personally, I would be happy with them all on my Christmas Tree .

Brent J. Jensen
R-6335
orbis non sufficit