I too read Doug's article on the Borlands.

I have very little experience in this hobby compared to the long history of experience that many have on the BB. I would appreciate it if I could be enlightened as to what in Doug's article doens't jibe with what is known vis a' vis' Gene's knowledge and understanding of the Borland fakes.

I'd like to draw my own conclusions and have immense respect for Doug and Gene and the more epxerienced collectors.

Thanks!