The Chip Board
Custom Search
   


The Chip Board Archive 08

Re: Outstanding Chip Liability
In Response To: Re: Outstanding Chip Liability ()

Pete,
Let me see if I can REALLY answer your question. Years ago the taxation laws would allow a casino to place its hotel on the accrual method of accounting and the casino on the cash method of accounting. This would give the Corporation the best of the tax law for each its entities - the hotel and the casino.

The casino would not have to recognize marker income until the marker was actually paid. This would save millions in tax dollars and not have to complicate the issue with the bad debt allowance which was also a favorite area for IRS agents.

To the best of my knowledge the last one to do this was the old MGM that burned down. It got in under the law change and was allowed the "cash" basis of accounting for the casino.

Since the cash method was an acceptable method of accounting the only time a problem would arise involving the financial statements was when the casino had to be converted to the accrual method for consolidation purposes with its other unrelated entities (movies, etc.) Otherwise the outstanding chip liability question did not exsist. Since the liability was contingent as to whether the chip WOULD EVER be redeemed it could be left off the financial statement and handled via footnote. Hence, the old MGM could do anything it liked on how the item was shown.

Today, the entity MUST be on the accrual method and the accruals are subject to the 2 1/2 month rule. In other words the accrual of the liability is not allowed unless the liability will be paid within 2 1/2 months of the close of the taxable year. This prevents the casino from deducting the outstanding chips as an expense. However, if you notice the income issue for the checks (chips)outstanding is still there. vbg
Hope this helps and I hope I did not put you and everyone else to sleep! rofl

Best, Mr."P"

Messages In This Thread

In a pleasant announcement posted on the Club BBS
What???? Not STEVE WYNN???
Re: What???? Not STEVE WYNN???
Not Collector Friendly STEVE WYNN!!!
Re: The actual reason ...
Re: The actual reason ...
There has to be a process...
Re: There has to be a process...
Re: There has to be a process...
I just visited your website for the first time...
Re: Thanks Larry!
Re: Hey Chuck ...
Tyrus
Re: Chuck
I've always wondered how they carried them...
Re: The actual reason ...
Re: The actual reason ...
Re: The actual reason ...
Re: The actual reason ...
Re: The actual reason ...
Re: It's two different things
Re: It's two different things
Re: It's two different things
Re: Outstanding Chip Liability
Re: Outstanding Chip Liability
Re: Outstanding Chip Liability
Re: Outstanding Chip Liability
Re: Outstanding Chip Liability
Re: Outstanding Chip Liability
I wish I were going to the convention...

Copyright 2022 David Spragg