The Chip Board
Custom Search
   


The Chip Board Archive 08

2,000+ Members...

What is right to some, may be wrong to others and what is wrong to some, may be right to others. Having reviewed the ccgtcc Constitution, By-Laws and Ethics, it appears there is no reason why a member, non-member or expelled member cannot write an article in the ccgtcc magazine. So now it becomes what was right to some... publishing the article, is wrong to others.

The real issue then lies with should publication of articles be limited only to members (in good-standing) of the ccgtcc?

Chuck believes this to be true... regretfully, he chose to pick his battle with an article written about a well-loved member of the ccgtcc. Instead of debating the limitations of what should or should not be published, everyone is defending their lost friend.

To make this objective, we need to remove the subjective portion... everyone's feeling and emotions for this particular article.

Other chat rooms/message boards I belong to have the ability to post surveys. This may be a great way to really see what the members feel objectively (once a vote is cast in the survey, it displays the current tally and prohibits you from voting again).

I hope the majority rules in this decision... my vote would be to allow anyone with useful information to publish an article in the ccgtcc magazine if it serves the membership in the pursuit of knowledge of Casino Chips & Gaming Tokens.

Messages In This Thread

Lets hear your views on Mel's article!
Re: Lets hear your views on Mel's article!
Article was right for the purpose; suitable; fit..
Re: Lets hear your views on Mel's article!
It was his FRIEND just let it rest!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
HERE! HERE!
Re: Lets hear your views on Mel's article!
Re: Lets hear your views on Mel's article!
Re: Lets hear your views on Mel's article!
Re: Lets hear your views on Mel's article!
Re: Lets hear your views on Mel's article!
MY VIEW
Re: Lets hear your views on Mel's article!
Re: Lets hear your views on Mel's article!
Re: Lets hear your views on Mel's article!
Re: Lets hear your views on Mel's article!
Re: Lets hear your views on Mel's article!
2,000+ Members...
Re: 2,000+ Members...
I didn't see a stated "policy"...
Re: I didn't see a stated "policy"...
Re: I didn't see a stated "policy"...
That's too bad...
Re: I didn't see a stated "Larry"...
Gene, Thanks for the Nomination...
Re: Gene, Thanks for the Nomination...
Re: 2,000+ Members...
Re: 2,000+ Members...
Oh my goodness....
Re: Perhaps "non-member" or a....
Re: Perhaps "non-member" or a....
Re: Perhaps "non-member" or a....
Re: Perhaps "non-member" or a....
Re: Lets hear your views on Mel's article!
Re: Lets hear your views on Mel's article!
Re: Lets hear your views on Mel's article!

Copyright 2022 David Spragg