The point we are making, Jim, is that you were not
harmed in the least by the seller. You fully agreed
to all that was discussed prior to you legally
paying for the goods and the method of shipment via
the USPS. You even refused
the offer when the seller wanted to adjust the
shipping charge from $5 to
$3.50 on two of the chip shipments. This is what
bothers those who
feel you were "wrong" and "hearltess."

In return,
you feel a
need for alert in a manner that could "harm" this person's
business because you were not careful enough and
"assumed" and "expected" how he would send the chips.

Since you received the chips in good order and got
exactly what you paid for, you should not have left
him four (4) negative feedbacks for the sole reason
of poor shipping that did not result in any loss to
you. You could have had
the same results of calling our attention to this
seller by simply posting a message here. The slap
in the face and the harm that can be caused by your
action
was totally uncalled for....not ony in my opinion,
but in the opinion of others who stated you were
"heartless" and out of place in your action. Sorry
to say this, Jim,
but you very well know that in a court of law you
would not have had a leg to stand on by taking the
action you did solely for what you consider poor
shipping that did not result in any damage to the chips or harm
to you. A simple explanation to the seller would
have been much better than a slap in the face.

Any person reading his descriptions should notice
his shipping fee is grossly out of line (as you
noticed, but agreed to) and should avoid his
auctions under those conditions. There is no good
reason for him to charge what he does

My purpose for this post, Jim, is to make a point
that we should not post negative feedback because we
feel offended that others do not meet our
expectations and have not breached any agreement or caused us harm or loss.

JB