... lack of perspective. He gets too caught up in his "causes".

Spence and Bugliosi, on the other hand, are ruthlessly honest with themselves about their cases. Whether I'd pick Jerry or Vince for trial would depend on the case -- if it was a highly complicated factual case requiring massive preparation, Bugliosi's the best there is. If it required a lot of innovative thinking and eloquent argument, Spence is the man. ----- jim