The Chip Board
Custom Search
   


The Chip Board Archive 02

Wasn't implying that ...

... you were being untruthful, Rich -- just suggesting that a really sensitive person desirous of insuring that he did injure the tender sensibilities of any of his potential readers might have gone back after the fact and rearranged the names so that at least one of the lawyers had a white one! <G>

----- jim o\-S

Messages In This Thread

A simple logic problem
Re: A simple logic problem
I'm miffed...
Re: I'm miffed...
I have no "basic intelligence"
Re: Not what I meant
Re: I'm miffed...
Re: Exactly! (EOM)
Re: A simple logic problem
Re: A simple logic problem
Obviously, you hadn't read ...
Re: Obviously, you hadn't read ...
Wasn't implying that ...
Re: Sorry Jim .....
Re: Now you're implying ...
Rodney Dangerfield ...
Re: Rodney Dangerfield ...
Re: A simple logic problem
Re: TWO (EOM)
Re: TWO at a minimum (EOM)
Re: THREE (EOM)
No more than three

Copyright 2022 David Spragg